An asset bubble is defined as a price level at which an asset's value is completely unrelated to its real value e.g. the price of a house being 4/5 times cost of building the house or a forward PE ratio of 40 times the company's profitability in the case of shares. An asset bubble can also be ascertained by comparing the price trend in a particular location with similar sized locations in other countries (in the case of house prices) and comparing company PEs where they are in the same sector. This article reviews the Kenyan experience of an asset bubble in its real estate and the stock market.
In real estate, although there is no data that is currently centrally corrected on movement in house prices (one is being planned), anecdotally, it can be shown that the house prices in all the areas lying between Garden Estate and South B have in the last four years increased four-fold (evidence of 50% growth in last 2 years here http://www.propertykenya.com/articles/kenya_real_estate_boom.phpm and here http://www.globalpropertyguide.com/country.php?id=100&cid=af&cat=5). 1/2/ acre plot that would have cost an average of ksh750k in 2003, now starts at ksh2.5m; the equivalent in the above places cost ksh1m in 2003 and now costs ksh4.5m plus. For a family home, these would have cost ksh3-10m but now range from ksh10m-40m+. In fact, all major towns in Kenya are now experiencing a housing boom driven by the increase in money supply; a more buoyant economic environment; huge increase in diaspora remittances and a move away from the big cities of Nairobi and Mombasa. However, the asset bubble in these areas of Nairobi has additionally been driven by some unique factors.
- Increased presence of NGOs with “phat” housing allowances for their staff thus a ready-made rental market increased population from the rural-urban migration and expatriates.
- Asymmetrical information i.e. there are very few real estate players who have a real idea of the comparative house prices in the areas they buy/sell. This has led to situations where sellers can call a price and be able offload their properties at those prices.
The evidence in the stock market is more mixed. The NSE index grew by 378% between Dec 2002 to June 2007. However, the drivers for this were in most cases supported by the underlying earnings growth of the shares. The additional factors such as more investors (domestic and diaspora) flowing into this market and more optimism about the direction of the economy are likely to remain in place. Inflation has grown by 50% in the economy as and will thus have had a bearing on company profits. Several counters are exhibiting bubble-like qualities even after the correction earlier this year, but are driven by speculative events specific to them. The evidence of a bubble in the stock market is patchy at best.
While there is something in the region of 500,000 stock market investors, those involved in the real estate are a much larger group. Thus the current real estate bubble is of concern because:
- It shows a dearth of similarly lucrative investment opportunities in other economic sectors.
- To the extent that asset inflation can have impacts on economic activity (those holding appreciating assets will use some of the equity to buy consumables or invest elsewhere), any bursting of this bubble would lead to negative multiplier impacts) will distort economic growth by focusing resources on sectors with low multiplier effects.
Options to slow down the bubble:
Monetary policy-one of the main drivers of current bubble was the reduction of banks' cash reserve to 6% from 10% and consequent reduction in yields from t-bills which meant that banks now had to go out and lend (BDA put growth in mortgage lending at ksh3bn in 2002 to ksh35bn in 2006). As such a tightening of this or other measures that would impact liquidity such as the proposed increase in capital requirements will reduce it
Fiscal-introduction of capital gains tax was muted last year by Kimunya who is clearly concerned about house prices.
Administrative: Planning permissions (as was done last year to allow utilities to catch up) and enforcing these rigorously would have the effect of spreading price growth to the whole city as opposed to particular areas of the city
Increased supply-will take time but is already having an effect in areas such as Kilimani and Kileleshwa.
Information: having an index that tracks prices and or a property price map would also allow real estate investors to make informed choices that would for example shift the burden from already densely built areas to other areas that require more housing. In NBI, making a economic case for building nicer houses in the slum areas would be a good result.
4 comments:
What is happening in Kenya is part of a worldwide asset bubble. Now that the US economy is frothing its just a matter of time before the rest of the world follows suit.
Gone are the days when you needed to have saved with HFCK for many years before they can give you a mortgage. There are numerous billboards and adverts for 100% mortgage financing.
I don't know who is buying the houses cause most of my peers, even those who earn 6 figures, live in rented accommodation.
Spot on analysis.The reality of a globalised economy is starting to dawn on us. In my opinion the diaspora is the reason behind the real estate unrealistic price appreciation. I was in the South of England recently; at Devonshire a county near the English channel, a simple English house; they do not have the huge forts we seem to be addicted to in Kenya lately; what is the use for these anyway, sorry I digress, costs close to 50M Ksh. A Kenyan, living there, and in the USA, and there are hordes of them, therefore has his concept of a fair price based on such prices and therefore, they are pushing the property prices here way beyond the affordability levels for a Kenyan who works or trades locally. Just like SSembonge, I know none of my peers who are affording such property so the victims must be beyond our boundaries. You can not eat your cake and have it; the contribution of the diaspora to our economy can not be gain said. This property appreciation is one of the downside of this remittances. A burble must burst; I do not think we have a burble because these prices are are being supported by solid economic factors. So long as the banks have money the government does not need in TB's, they will continue to lend easily. So long as Kenyans are part of the global economy, remittances back home will continue
Ssem, i purposely avoided the international angle (UK has a similar issue with average house prices in London being aalmost six times the average salary), because the US-effect on Kenya is still quite ltd.
I believe diaspora, GoK officials, NGOs an even private sector employees (especially in those in blue chips) are driving the market.
JK-Nice comment. Si you say hallo next time you pass via London. The diaspora issue is one i've attached on in a different way i.e. the lack of other lucrative but easy to access oppurtinities.
Granted it is a while since this was written, and a lot has changed economically on a global scale. Recently though it has been suggested that the mortgage market is now booming in Kenya, (http://www.ipinglobal.com/ipin-live/news/328976/mortgage-boom-supports-rising-kenyan-property-market) Has this had further positive effects for the Kenyan economy in your opinion?
Post a Comment